View Single Post
Old May 9th, 2005, 05:34 PM   #2
Aveosmth
 
Join Date: 01-28-2005
Posts: 241
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0
Aveosmth is on a distinguished road
Iskhur,

I think that the first half of your article was solid, but after that, your piece begins to stray more & more from the reality of the NBA.

You stated that Stockton played in the era of the "superstar". I think its dangerous to try and fit Stockton's career in one era as he played in multiple...20 years is a long time. I think that the era of the "superstar" you are referring to began when Jordan retired in 93'. Before that teamwork and execution were highly valued. This was the golden era of the NBA from about 1979-1993. As you can see, Stockton played in between eras as his career lasted from 84-03.

The main reason Stockton never won an MVP is because he happened to play when Magic Johnson & Michael Jordan ruled the NBA. It definitely didn't help that he played the same position (guard) as them as well...Also, he may not have been even the most valuable player on his own team. Karl Malone was pretty darn important as well.

Also, Nash didn't handily defeat Shaq...this was the 4th closest MVP vote of all time. I was very split as to who I thought should've won, but I think Nash is the best choice. I'm not totally sold though, that it was a "statement" vote. Nash averaged 15 points a game & and over 11 assists. He's basically averaging a double/double a night, and his team has the most wins in the league. Based upon those facts, he should win the award no matter what era were in.

I agree with you that the fans are tired of players who whine and complain. There is no debating there...Good point.

All in all, good work.
Aveosmth is offline   Reply With Quote