|
How do you figure? The rebuttal rounds isn't used to talk about the topic already discussed in the first round. Thre rebuttal rounds is used to rip to shreads your opponent's article, which I did. You quoting that Jackson saying he wouldn't coach the team if Kobe is there ONCE AGAIN proves my point. The team wasn't going to take Jackson over Kobe so Phil didn't come back. Obviously, the Lakers feel that Kobe is well worth the money he's being paid.
And after reading and re-reading your rebuttal, I can't see how anything you wrote scores you any points. The Lakers are essentially a rebuilding team. They have lost or have gotten rid of several players from last years team. Miami has a good base. Shaq coming in only helped. Obviously, it wasn't good enough or they would have gotten to the promise land. And to ask if I admire Rae Carruth is just stupid on your part. If you read what I wrote you would say that I didn't condone what he did at all, but that I admired how he was able to rebound from the trouble that he got into. Did Rae Rae rebound from it? No. So, nice try, but you're not comaring apples to apples there, my friend.
Anyway, if I wanted your opinion on my rebuttal, I would have given it to you. The only opinion that matters is that of the judges.
|