The Patriots are not a dynasty

[mark_chalifoux]

The Patriots Are Not a Dynasty

By Mark Chalifoux
Tuesday, February 08, 2005


New England was the heavy favorite. Everyone outside of Pennsylvania was putting their money on the two-time champs. There was no way the Eagles could win, the talking heads yelled. On paper, New England was the better team, a dynasty in the making, but as the saying goes, that’s why they play the games.

Unfortunately, they had to play this game, leaving us with one of the most anti-climatic Super Bowls in history. Sure, the score was close, but everyone knew the Pats were going to win from the start. Even the chimps from the Careerfinder.com commercial could’ve picked this one. The outcome of this game was never in question, which says something about this Patriots team. For me, the highlight of the night was the start of "The Simpsons."

I didn’t want the Pats to win, but if they were going to win, I wanted them to make it exciting. I couldn’t believe McNabb’s clock management at the end of the game. I expected him to back away from the line with time running out on the play clock and take off his helmet and gear to reveal a Patriots jersey underneath, before heading to the Pats bench to exchange high fives with Brady and Belichick; leaving Philly fans stunned and Santa laughing in spiteful delight.

That would’ve at least been interesting. As it was, we were subjected to another Pats win and the endless dynasty talk.

Watching ESPN after the game, they must have called the Pats a dynasty no less than 45,323 times in seven minutes. Now, before we go any further, let me clarify this point for ESPN and the entire world. The Patriots are NOT a dynasty! Bob Ryan was on my radio show this past week and made this point very well.

The definition of a dynasty (according to Dictionary.com) is "a family or group that maintains power for several generations."

Ryan then said something I agreed with. There are three dynasties in sports: The Celtics, the Yankees, and the Canadiens. What New England has done during recent years has been great, but they clearly are not a dynasty. What they have is a great team (maybe the best ever?) or a great era, but they cannot be a dynasty until they have complete turnover and continue to be at the top.

Can they have that? Sure. Do they now? Absolutely not. I know New England fans think it’s cute to call it a dynasty. I know that ESPN likes to throw the word around because it makes the game bigger than it is, but what is so hard about this? It’s a simple concept, and until New England is consistently at the top of the NFL for several generations, they just are not a dynasty.

That is not a knock on their organization. I understand and respect its greatness. There is definitely something to be said for their team when everyone knows they will win the Super Bowl and they come and do it. That kind of dominance is to be admired. People just need to realize that the Patriots are not a dynasty.

I was talking to my friend from New England after the game, and he refused to let the dynasty talk die. I rationally explained the definition to him and how he was abusing the English language (along with ESPN and most of the sports media world) and he still wouldn’t accept it.

His stellar argument consisted mostly of "you have to change the definition of a dynasty for the NFL." Now, I’m not sure, but if you have to change the definition of something to make it apply, it probably doesn’t apply. I can argue that socks are actually apples all day long, but you will never see caramel-coated socks at the grocery store (unless you shop at the same grocery store as Star Jones, where I imagine everything must be caramel-coated).

My friend, ultimately realizing the inevitability of his defeat, tried to accuse me of being biased. What he failed to realize is that this wasn’t about Me vs. Him, or Patriots Nation vs. Sports Gospel, this was Him (and anyone else calling the Pats a dynasty) vs. The English Language, and he was losing.

New England fans, enjoy your third Super Bowl in four years. Sports fans everywhere, acknowledge and respect the Belichick era and respect what this team has done. Talking heads, continue to heap your praise on this organization.

All I ask is that you leave the dynasty talk with Philadelphia’s victory champagne -- still on ice.

[BtownJay]

OHHHHHH, this would be a GREAT topic for Aveo's "point/counterpoint" contest. I can't write to save my life but could make very good arguements for them being a dynasty and against them being a dynasty.

IMO, the reason this is brought up so much is because there are so many people on complete opposite sides of the fence on this topic. This is one that you could make many arguements for and argue about it for months if not years.

But it is a good article Mark.

**And if you wouldn't make me look retarded by your writing ability, i would have loved to "point/counterpoint" the whole Michael Vick thing with you! That was fun.

[mark_chalifoux]

if you can make the argument, then you will be fine. Just remember, no matter how bad your writing may be, at least Mikes will be worse. And the vick thing was fun, you should get involved in the point/counterpoint, I'd like arguing with you

[BtownJay]

Well if writing ability doesn't count then i would definitly do it. As long as im not going to get killed because of grammatical errors and puncuation mistakes, etc. But i'll use spell checker because obviously i can't do that either. And lol, yes, we always have Mike to make me look better.

We'll have to wait and see how this is all set up, but i'll go to battle with you. I figure if i'm going to do it, i might as well do it against one of the best. (don't let it go to your head! )

We'll have to wait and see what topics he's looking for, but i for one would choose BOXING!