|
|
|
||||||
| Point-counterpoint Point/Counterpoint is where members go head to head applying their knowledge in the sports world, a battle of the sports know-it-all. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: 01-28-2005
Posts: 241
![]() |
Ishkur-Mark C. Quarterfinal Thread
This is the thread that will house this quarterfinal matchup. All predictions, comments & questions should be posed here. Once the articles are finished, the results will also be posted here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 27,221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
good luck to both of you.....if mark loses, i wonder if he'll start the ishkur thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
This is the one I am looking forward to most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
This one will be an instant classic!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 27,221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i think its already a classic and it hasn't even been done yet...amazing...lets all rejoice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I will predict their rebuttals will be 5,000 words each. This could set all time P/CP records.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 27,221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
at least we know jay won his round already...or so he says
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
When does this stuff go live?
I thought it was going to be quicker than this...and more public. It's been about two weeks, and we're not even done Round 1. How much longer is this going to take? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: 01-28-2005
Posts: 241
![]() |
How funny, I just sent you a PM Iskhur
The results from round one will be announced by Sunday. I understand your frustration, and I am working on speeding up the process. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: 01-28-2005
Posts: 241
![]() |
One more thing...it will DEFINITELY be public!!! You can bet your Canadian dollar on that one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I'm not frustrated. I'm just, like......c'mon, let's pick up the pace here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I'm getting the articles now, at a glance I'd have to say this is going to be AWESOME!!!
I'll have my scores in tonight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Join Date: 07-02-2004
Posts: 305
![]() |
I'm with Ishkur...although this one should have been his if he picked Tretiak
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Either of us would have lost if we picked Tretiak.
He was never tested against the best of the best on any consistent basis. That puts him in "shoulda-woulda-coulda" territory, which is a lousy argument. Focus on people who actually DID things, not people who might have. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The topic on this one was: Who is the best non-North American born hockey player ever? Iskhur chose Jaromir Jagr/Mark chose Peter Forsberg Iskhur's Article: Jaromir Jagr At the eve of a new NHL season, with a new emphasis on opening the game and making it fun for offense again, Jaromir Jagr is on a mission. He wants to prove to everyone that he is still the best player of the post-Gretzky era, and easily the best non-North American player to ever grace the NHL. Jagr’s offensive production has been staggering in an era handcuffed by stifling defensive strategies the past decade. As of this writing, he sits at 1323 career points, good for 24th overall in the entire 100-year history of the NHL. The scary part about this is, at age 33, he insists that his best days are still ahead of him, and at the pace he’s going, will probably pass Jari Kurri (1398) sometime later this year for the spot of most prolific European sniper of all time. Before all is said and done, if he stays healthy, by the time he retires we might see hockey historians re-sculpt the holy pantheon to put him second, perhaps, only to Gretzky in terms of raw offensive point production. Such a prolific weapon hasn’t gone unnoticed. The Czech has picked up some pretty generous hardware over the years: a Gold Medal with the Czech Republic in the 1998 Olympics (the first Olympics to allow NHL players to compete), two Stanley Cups with the Penguins, two Lester B Pearsons and a Hart trophy in 1999 despite only playing 63 games. But probably the most amazing accomplishment are his scoring titles. Jagr became the first non-North American player to win the Art Ross trophy when he captured the league scoring title in 1995. Since then, he has won it four more times. For comparison’s sake, only four other players in league history have at least five Art Ross awards sitting on their mantels: Wayne Gretzky (10), Mario Lemieux (6), Gordie Howe (6) and Phil Esposito (5). That is some extraordinarily exclusive company. Jagr is not only the only European among this group, but he was also the only player good enough to finally interrupt the 16-year succession of Gretzky and Lemieux scoring titles in the 80s and 90s, as the heir apparent to their reigns. In 1996, his best season, Jagr broke Mike Bossy’s record for most goals by a right-winger with 62 and assists for that same year (87), arguably making him the deadliest right-winger in NHL history. Jagr has impressive work ethic. Back in his days in Pittsburgh, he often had a routine where he would show up to the arena two hours before game time, before everyone else, and run laps around the upper deck’s hallowed halls. A strong proponent of physical fitness and personal improvement, Jagr never slacks off or looks for excuses. Only nagging injuries have kept him from operating at optimum efficiency. This year, a re-invigorated Jagr is where he should be—back in the thick of the NHL scoring race, with 23 points in 16 games. One could chalk it up to enthusiasm after being away for a year, and interest in what the new league is like after several years being in a sort of funk due to its suffocating defensive paradigms. But personally, I think it’s because he’s growing his hair back. He’s like Samson when he has that lovely, curly black mullet of his. Mark's Article: There have been a plethora of great foreign hockey players, but none were better than Peter Forsberg. There have been some great Russian players, and Vladislav Tretiak was a player I gave strong consideration before settling on Forsberg. He was one of the greatest goalies to play the game, but my main problem was with the fact that he played too long ago and didn’t play against the top competition in the world. I have the same issue with any player who didn’t play in the NHL or played a few decades ago. The game has changed drastically and the competition has improved tenfold with the addition of foreign players and the different training regimen’s and the defensive changes we’ve seen in the game. There is no question that, prior to the lockout and rules changes, hockey was seeing its toughest offensive period (which was a big reason for the rules changes). Despite the strong focus on defense in the past 10 years, Peter Forsberg still thrived on the offensive side of the game. From the moment he came into the league, he was a star. His first year in the NHL he won the Calder Trophy (rookie of the year) and led the Nordiques to the top of their division. He’s also won Viking awards (for top Swedish player in the NHL), numerous player of the week and player of the month awards, named first team all-star several times, named captain of the all-world team at the all-star game, and was the first swede to win the Art Ross trophy. Most importantly, he led his team to win the Stanley Cup twice. Forsberg is considered the game’s best player right now, not the best foreign player, but the best player in the entire league. Since he’s been in the league, he has always been considered one of the elite players. He has been a consistent top-5 choice for the Hockey News top-40 players list every year and even in years he’s limited to injuries he still averages better than a point a game. His game simply does not slow down. The offensive numbers he puts up, during the time when the NHL’s defense was at its best, are simply staggering. He has always either led or been near the top in points per game and, on top of his points, his +/- is always among league leaders. I think one of his most impressive attributes is his ability to score. Anyone can score with enough shots, but Forsberg has one of the top shots in the game. In the last full season of hockey Forsberg led the league in shooting percentage (an underrated statistic). There is no question in my mind that Forsberg is the best non-North American hockey player because he has consistently performed at the highest level and is one of the game’s most able scorers in history. Iskhur's Rebuttal: Peter Forsberg!?!? Excuse my french, but Peter fucking Forsberg? Why anyone would count on anything from Sweden to be the best in anything is beyond me. Forsberg was lucky he got saddled up with arguably the most dominant team of the last decade, and he STILL punked out for most of that time. Statistically speaking, he isn't even in Jagr's galactic orbit, let alone his league. It would be generous to say he can wear Jagr's jockstrap for a game or two. Both players are relatively the same age. Jagr has nearly twice as many points as Forsberg. And when Jagr got hurt, he still played hard, through his injuries, and still averaged over a point a game in a league that had gotten so suffocatingly defensive, point-a-game snipers were rare. What did Forsberg do during this slugfest? He punked out like a wimp, skedaddled back to Sweden and took an ENTIRE YEAR OFF (2001-2002) (and in another season only played 39 games before whining and quitting while whining quittingly) because the game was too tough for him. The mark of any great player's legacy to the league he devotes his life to is the magical milestone of 500 goals. Peter is lucky if he reaches 300. That puts him right up there with such legendary hockey powerhouses as Doug Weight and Keith Tkachuck. His exploits have been overshadowed by more prolific Europeans like Peter Bondra and Teemu Selanne. Forsberg is lucky if he reaches Hakan Loob status in his own country. Nicklas Lidstrom has just as many points, and he's a DEFENCEMEN. His Calder was already slanted in his favour: He was 22 when he won that. Yeah, real special award there, pal. After already playing professional hockey for five years (four after he'd been drafted), narrowly beating out fresh-faced, wet-behind-the-ears, 18 year olds straight out of Junior to win the best "Rookie" award. Give y |