|
|
|
|||||||
| College Basketball This forum is for general college basketball discussion, covering all aspects and talk on NCAA basketball |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: 08-08-2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,602
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() |
UCLA doesn't deserve a top seed!
Sorry KP, if you're still around here somewhere. A team that closes out the season with two straight losses (to two of the bottom teams in their conference, at that), is not deserving of a #1 seed in the NCAA tournament. Everyone says UCLA will still get a top seed, but if Wisconsin beats Ohio State, I believe both should get #1's, with the other two going to Kansas and UNC (if they both win their conferences). If Ohio State wins, I think OSU, Kansas, Florida, and UNC are all more deserving than UCLA. Either way, UCLA won't advance past the Sweet 16, regardless what their seed is. Quite frankly, if they get a #1 they could very likely be the first team ever to lose to a 16 seed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 28,689
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
no worries....they didn't get one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
wow, i missed this. Mensa comes out of no where!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 28,689
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
he felt that strong about it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: 08-08-2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,602
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() |
Indeed, I did. And yes, this was a topic I felt strongly about. Come on, two straight losses and all the analysts still had them picked for a #1 seed? With the Badgers' pathetic performance against OSU along with KU, UNC, and Florida all picking up wins, it ultimately didn't matter. If Texas didn't choke, I guarantee UCLA would have gotten that undeserving #1 seed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 28,689
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
so i'm assuming by your avatar and by your biased opinion, you root for the badgers??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: 06-15-2006
Location: Salem, MA
Posts: 5,702
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As William Munny said to Little Bill; "Deserves got nuthin to do with it".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: 07-15-2004
Location: Knoxville,Tenn.
Posts: 31,057
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 28,689
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i was being sarcastic anyway rusty....
out of the other 2 seeds...who would deserve it more than them... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 28,689
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
if kansas lost, they mighta been knocked off the #1 seed..if thats the case, what #2 seed is more deserving than them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Thats a tough question, there may not be a more deserving team (but you can make a case for Memphis and Wisconsin). However, Kansas didn't lose, so they deserve the top seed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Join Date: 03-15-2004
Posts: 28,689
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
memphis has a great record but a pretty cupcake schedule...you can say wisconsin but then we agree with mensa and this is a place for discussion, not agreement all the time
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Join Date: 07-15-2004
Location: Knoxville,Tenn.
Posts: 31,057
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |