Auburn getting some respect.

focal22 · November 14th, 2004, 02:50 PM

Auburn and Oklahoma tied for No. 2

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?s...v=ap&type=lgns

Auburn closing in on Oklahoma in coaches poll

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?s...v=st&type=lgns

AP POLL
1625 is highest total u can get
TEAM PTS PVS
---- --- ---
1. USC (51) (10-0) 1,608 1
2. (tie) AUBURN (6) (10-0) 1,536 3
2. (tie) OKLAHOMA (8) (10-0) 1,536 2
4. CALIFORNIA (8-1) 1,409 5
5. UTAH (10-0) 1,316 7
6. TEXAS (9-1) 1,301 6
7. MICHIGAN (9-1) 1,279 9
8. LOUISVILLE (7-1) 1,279 12
9. WISCONSIN (9-1) 1,012 4
10. FLORIDA ST (8-2) 1,004 11
11. GEORGIA (8-2) 979 8
12. MIAMI FLA (7-2) 834 18
13. BOISE ST (9-0) 797 14
14. LSU (7-2) 786 17
15. (tie) TENNESSEE (7-2) 733 15
15. (tie) VIRGINIA TECH (7-2) 733 16
17. IOWA (8-2) 626 19
18. VIRGINIA (7-2) 541 10
19. BOSTON COLLEGE (7-2) 490 21
20. ARIZONA ST (8-2) 442 20
21. WEST VIRGINIA (8-2) 330 13
22. TEXAS A&M (7-3) 274 22
23. OKLAHOMA ST (7-3) 223 25
24. TEXAS EL PASO (7-2) 152 23
25. BOWLING GREEN (8-2) 42 NR

Coaches
1525 is highest total
1. USC (51) (10-0) 1,514 1
2. OKLAHOMA (6) (10-0) 1,435 2
3. AUBURN (4) (10-0) 1,433 3
4. CALIFORNIA (8-1) 1,311 6
5. TEXAS (9-1) 1,222 7
6. UTAH (10-0) 1,203 8
7. MICHIGAN (9-1) 1,191 9
8. FLORIDA ST (8-2) 999 12
9. WISCONSIN (9-1) 948 4
10. GEORGIA (8-2) 947 5
11. LOUISVILLE (7-1) 880 14
12. BOISE ST (9-0) 827 13
13. MIAMI FLA (7-2) 774 17
14. LSU (7-2) 771 15
15. VIRGINIA TECH (7-2) 688 16
16. TENNESSEE (7-2) 580 18
17. IOWA (8-2) 519 19
18. VIRGINIA (7-2) 501 11
19. BOSTON COLLEGE (7-2) 433 21
20. WEST VIRGINIA (8-2) 419 10
21. ARIZONA ST (8-2) 411 20
22. TEXAS A&M (7-3) 272 23
23. OKLAHOMA ST (7-3) 229 24
24. BOWLING GREEN (8-2) 117 NR
25. TEXAS EL PASO (7-2) 87 NR

HUSKERSnCUBS · November 14th, 2004, 11:27 PM

They should get respect they beat a good Georgia team handily

jtg33 · November 15th, 2004, 06:43 PM

They may be tied with Oklahoma for second in the AP poll, but the BCS still isn't giving them any love so far. Oklahoma will probably have to lose a game in order for Auburn to move into second in the BCS standings.

HUSKERSnCUBS · November 15th, 2004, 06:46 PM

I believe it should be Oklahoma vs Auburn in the championship if they both win out and win their conference championships the SEC and Big 12 are 100 times better then the PAC 10

jtg33 · November 15th, 2004, 06:54 PM

USC is the defending champion and they're still #1. Until they lose a game or get knocked off, they'll stay #1 and I won't be able to agree with you on that. I'd say that Auburn shoudl be #2 because the SEC is incredibly tough, while only half the Big XII is any good.

focal22 · November 15th, 2004, 11:43 PM

100 times better?? LMFAO. please take off your blinders.

HUSKERSnCUBS · November 16th, 2004, 08:40 PM

ok well the Big 12 south is good but the north thats something different the Pac 10 has 2 real good teams California and USC...

focal22 · November 21st, 2004, 01:49 PM

link to one of the 6 computers used in the BCS polls. links to the other 5 are at the top. This one is the Billingsley computer.

http://www.cfrc.com/

OriginalBob · November 21st, 2004, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jtg33

USC is the defending champion and they're still #1. Until they lose a game or get knocked off, they'll stay #1 and I won't be able to agree with you on that. I'd say that Auburn shoudl be #2 because the SEC is incredibly tough, while only half the Big XII is any good.

I can't see where the SEC is tough, show me.
Don't listen to the talking heads. Maybe 3 teams in the SEC are tough. The rest of the conference is just OK, like the big12 North.

jtg33 · November 21st, 2004, 05:46 PM

The Big XII North isn't just okay though... We suck compared to the Big XII South. You're right, not all of the SEC is "tough." What I probably meant to say is that the majority of the SEC is far more competitive against the other teams - they always compete, and games are close - than the teams in the Big XII. There's no question between North and South in the Big XII. Just about every time they've played, the South has come out on top by a wide margin.

OriginalBob · November 21st, 2004, 06:34 PM

But I don't think ANY of the Big 12 teams, played teams like Div 1AA Citadel or LA Monroe!! Jesus! Auburn dropped Bowling Green so they could play the Citadel...

jtg33 · November 21st, 2004, 11:49 PM

Nebraska played a 1-AA team to start their season. I think that would count.

Chris Kelley · November 22nd, 2004, 12:14 AM

#4 California's the one to watch to determine the strength of the PAC-10. USC leads, and beat Michigan last year in the Rose Bowl. Anyone who thinks the blood&gore Big-10[11] isn't tough is delusional. Only one year has passed, and they're still unbeaten. USC is therefore very, very good....but is it the PAC-1-and-9, is the issue. Cal will face someone strong. #4 ranking, barring any loss at season end (is the season over for them? Not sure...), will insure that. If Cal were to lose badly to another major power, then there's a legitimate claim to the PAC being weaker...but still no right to say USC wouldn't be an exception.

In the end, there are two PAC-10 teams right now in the top four, on both polls. What does that mean.

November 21st, 2004, 06:34 PM	#11
OriginalBob Join Date: 08-14-2003 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 1,650	But I don't think ANY of the Big 12 teams, played teams like Div 1AA Citadel or LA Monroe!! Jesus! Auburn dropped Bowling Green so they could play the Citadel... Last edited by OriginalBob; November 24th, 2004 at 09:58 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

November 14th, 2004, 02:50 PM	#1
focal22 Join Date: 08-07-2002 Posts: 6,506	Auburn getting some respect. Auburn and Oklahoma tied for No. 2 http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?s...v=ap&type=lgns Auburn closing in on Oklahoma in coaches poll http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?s...v=st&type=lgns AP POLL 1625 is highest total u can get TEAM PTS PVS ---- --- --- 1. USC (51) (10-0) 1,608 1 2. (tie) AUBURN (6) (10-0) 1,536 3 2. (tie) OKLAHOMA (8) (10-0) 1,536 2 4. CALIFORNIA (8-1) 1,409 5 5. UTAH (10-0) 1,316 7 6. TEXAS (9-1) 1,301 6 7. MICHIGAN (9-1) 1,279 9 8. LOUISVILLE (7-1) 1,279 12 9. WISCONSIN (9-1) 1,012 4 10. FLORIDA ST (8-2) 1,004 11 11. GEORGIA (8-2) 979 8 12. MIAMI FLA (7-2) 834 18 13. BOISE ST (9-0) 797 14 14. LSU (7-2) 786 17 15. (tie) TENNESSEE (7-2) 733 15 15. (tie) VIRGINIA TECH (7-2) 733 16 17. IOWA (8-2) 626 19 18. VIRGINIA (7-2) 541 10 19. BOSTON COLLEGE (7-2) 490 21 20. ARIZONA ST (8-2) 442 20 21. WEST VIRGINIA (8-2) 330 13 22. TEXAS A&M (7-3) 274 22 23. OKLAHOMA ST (7-3) 223 25 24. TEXAS EL PASO (7-2) 152 23 25. BOWLING GREEN (8-2) 42 NR Coaches 1525 is highest total 1. USC (51) (10-0) 1,514 1 2. OKLAHOMA (6) (10-0) 1,435 2 3. AUBURN (4) (10-0) 1,433 3 4. CALIFORNIA (8-1) 1,311 6 5. TEXAS (9-1) 1,222 7 6. UTAH (10-0) 1,203 8 7. MICHIGAN (9-1) 1,191 9 8. FLORIDA ST (8-2) 999 12 9. WISCONSIN (9-1) 948 4 10. GEORGIA (8-2) 947 5 11. LOUISVILLE (7-1) 880 14 12. BOISE ST (9-0) 827 13 13. MIAMI FLA (7-2) 774 17 14. LSU (7-2) 771 15 15. VIRGINIA TECH (7-2) 688 16 16. TENNESSEE (7-2) 580 18 17. IOWA (8-2) 519 19 18. VIRGINIA (7-2) 501 11 19. BOSTON COLLEGE (7-2) 433 21 20. WEST VIRGINIA (8-2) 419 10 21. ARIZONA ST (8-2) 411 20 22. TEXAS A&M (7-3) 272 23 23. OKLAHOMA ST (7-3) 229 24 24. BOWLING GREEN (8-2) 117 NR 25. TEXAS EL PASO (7-2) 87 NR Last edited by focal22; November 14th, 2004 at 03:01 PM.

November 14th, 2004, 11:27 PM	#2
HUSKERSnCUBS Join Date: 06-25-2004 Location: Omaha Posts: 958	They should get respect they beat a good Georgia team handily

November 15th, 2004, 06:43 PM	#3
jtg33 Join Date: 03-17-2004 Location: Colorado Posts: 4,487	They may be tied with Oklahoma for second in the AP poll, but the BCS still isn't giving them any love so far. Oklahoma will probably have to lose a game in order for Auburn to move into second in the BCS standings.

November 15th, 2004, 06:46 PM	#4
HUSKERSnCUBS Join Date: 06-25-2004 Location: Omaha Posts: 958	I believe it should be Oklahoma vs Auburn in the championship if they both win out and win their conference championships the SEC and Big 12 are 100 times better then the PAC 10

November 15th, 2004, 06:54 PM	#5
jtg33 Join Date: 03-17-2004 Location: Colorado Posts: 4,487	USC is the defending champion and they're still #1. Until they lose a game or get knocked off, they'll stay #1 and I won't be able to agree with you on that. I'd say that Auburn shoudl be #2 because the SEC is incredibly tough, while only half the Big XII is any good.

November 15th, 2004, 11:43 PM	#6
focal22 Join Date: 08-07-2002 Posts: 6,506	100 times better?? LMFAO. please take off your blinders.

November 16th, 2004, 08:40 PM	#7
HUSKERSnCUBS Join Date: 06-25-2004 Location: Omaha Posts: 958	ok well the Big 12 south is good but the north thats something different the Pac 10 has 2 real good teams California and USC...

November 21st, 2004, 01:49 PM	#8
focal22 Join Date: 08-07-2002 Posts: 6,506	link to one of the 6 computers used in the BCS polls. links to the other 5 are at the top. This one is the Billingsley computer. http://www.cfrc.com/

November 21st, 2004, 05:46 PM	#10
jtg33 Join Date: 03-17-2004 Location: Colorado Posts: 4,487	The Big XII North isn't just okay though... We suck compared to the Big XII South. You're right, not all of the SEC is "tough." What I probably meant to say is that the majority of the SEC is far more competitive against the other teams - they always compete, and games are close - than the teams in the Big XII. There's no question between North and South in the Big XII. Just about every time they've played, the South has come out on top by a wide margin.

November 21st, 2004, 11:49 PM	#12
jtg33 Join Date: 03-17-2004 Location: Colorado Posts: 4,487	Nebraska played a 1-AA team to start their season. I think that would count.

November 22nd, 2004, 12:14 AM	#13
Chris Kelley Join Date: 11-20-2004 Posts: 66	#4 California's the one to watch to determine the strength of the PAC-10. USC leads, and beat Michigan last year in the Rose Bowl. Anyone who thinks the blood&gore Big-10[11] isn't tough is delusional. Only one year has passed, and they're still unbeaten. USC is therefore very, very good....but is it the PAC-1-and-9, is the issue. Cal will face someone strong. #4 ranking, barring any loss at season end (is the season over for them? Not sure...), will insure that. If Cal were to lose badly to another major power, then there's a legitimate claim to the PAC being weaker...but still no right to say USC wouldn't be an exception. In the end, there are two PAC-10 teams right now in the top four, on both polls. What does that mean.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)